News Archives

Mila Lee from UoA

2019 MikesBikes World Champs Winner: Mila Lee from University of Auckland

Mila Lee also known as Da Li (pictured on the right) competed against the best teams from around the globe and have achieved a Shareholder Value of $136.18.

To wrap up the 2019 MikesBikes World Champs, we have interviewed Mila and ask her about their experience in the competition and what she thought about the simulation.

1. What is your decision making process within the simulation?

After each rollover, I would start by studying the reports and learn about the new market environment, evaluate the opponents’ moves and identify the strengths and weaknesses internally. Based on the above information and my overall strategy, I would make decisions for the next rollover.

2. What was your strategy going into the simulation?

I guess my strategy would be keeping the ultimate goal—boosting SHV in mind. Try to think one step ahead and always keep a close eye on the market. Analyzing corporate positions constantly and prioritize spending. I would make a full product development schedule from the start and use financial decisions wisely.

3. What challenges did you face? How did you overcome these? 

The biggest challenge for me is even if I had the idea of minimizing cost and waste in mind when I make each decision, the results were usually different from what I anticipated, a majority of the time. I would just learn from the results, doing more analysis and try to be more precise in the next round.

4. Was there anything, in particular, you did that you think helped to prepare yourself? 

My prep job started by digging into the Manuel and learn the basic logic, practice as much as I can using the single-player version. As I get more familiar with the simulation, I begin to put the theories I learned throughout my course into real use.

5. What do you think of the business simulation? 

It’s my first time using a business simulation and I think it’s more fun to learn this way. I get to coordinate and make decisions concerning each functional area of the company, which makes me feel more participated and in control.

6. Comments on your experience in your course simulation and with the MikesBikes World Champs

It was an enjoyable and educational experience, I get to work within a team during my course simulation, besides developing business management skills, it also provides a place for leadership to emerge. The World Champs is another chance to compete with the best teams throughout the world, it was a wonderful game and I enjoyed each and every rollover. 

7. Advice to future students

Don’t be too frustrated or afraid to lose, focus on absorbing from the experiences and most of all, enjoy the simulation!

Related Articles

MikesBikes World Champs Smartsims

The 2019 MikesBikes World Champs | Final Results

163 students from around the globe, 97 firms and two weeks of intense competition – we now have the Winner of the 2019 MikesBikes World Champs.

The 2019 MikesBikes World Champs Winner is Mila Lee from University of Auckland!

We are proud to announce that Mila Lee of PedalPals from University of Auckland is the 2019 MikesBikes World Champs Winner! Congratulations Mila for this outstanding achievement!

After the first rollover, Mila came in at third place. However, she has successfully managed to retain the top position throughout the remaining rollovers. Your determination and dedication to succeed certainly showed. We are sure that a lot of students will be inspired by your success.

In Second Place, we have Jin Fong and Luther Gray from Manukau Institute of Technology!

Congratulations Jin Fong and Luther Gray from Manukau Institute of Technology for coming in at second place!

We have seen your journey throughout the competition. There were certainly a lot of ups and downs. However, because of your drive to succeed and your impressive abilities, you were able to achieve success in this year’s competition.

Full Scoreboard

PosFirmSHVTeam MembersInstitution
1PedalPals$136.18 Mila LeeUniversity of Auckland
2Montague Bikes$118.21 Jin Fong | Luther GrayManukau Institute of Technology
3One T Cycles$95.03 Mat MillardTAFE SA
4Rice Inc.$61.36 Taylor RiceArizona State University
5Tindug$50.46 Dung NguyenSelkirk College
6Super Velos$44.55 Shawn ReccaUniversity of Oregon
7RDU Bikes$35.58 George Van Campen | Kaitlyn StolRed Deer College
8H and A Co.$34.86 Aaron Hirahara | Dylan AllenSanta Clara University
9Mikecycles$2.23 Daniel OldakDuquesne University
10Nicks Bees$0.01 Nicolas VallejoBroward College

Thank you to everyone who joined!

To the Top 10 Finalists, to all our Qualifying Round competitors and to the instructors – it was such a pleasure to have you all in this year’s MikesBikes World Champs! It wouldn’t be a success if it wasn’t for you all. We are certain that you have inspired all current and future students using MikesBikes to strive for success. We wish you all the best!

MikesBikes World Champs Smartsims

Meet the Finalists for the 2019 MikesBikes World Champs

We now have the list of participants for the Final Rounds of the 2019 MikesBikes World Champs!

These teams and solo competitors will be competing from the 12th until the 19th of December. As in the Qualifying round, Final ranks will be based on Shareholder Value. The winners will also be featured on the Smartsims’ website to recognize an exceptionally world class performance.

Keep an eye on their progress here and show them your support on our Facebook page. You can also use #2019SmartsimsMWC on both Facebook and Instagram.

Wishing everyone all the best! Hope you enjoy and find this to be a valuable experience!

StudentInstitution
Shawn ReccaUniversity of Oregon
Daniel OldakDuquesne University
Aaron Hirahara | Dylan AllenSanta Clara University
George Van Campen | Kaitlyn StolRed Deer College
Jin Fong | Luther GrayManukau Institute of Technology
Nicolas VallejoBroward College
Dung NguyenSelkirk College
Mila LeeUniversity of Auckland
Taylor RiceArizona State University
Mat MillardTAFE SA
MikesBikes World Champs

Meet the 2019 MikesBikes World Champs Qualifying Round Competitors

We now have the final list of Qualifying Round competitors for the 2019 MikesBikes World Champs!

These teams and solo competitors will be competing from the 8th until the 11th of December in the Qualifying Rounds to land a spot in the Top 10 for the Final Rounds!

Keep an eye on their progress here and show them your support on our Facebook page. You can also use #2019SmartsimsMWC on both Facebook and Instagram.

Wishing everyone all the best! Hope you enjoy and find this to be a valuable experience!

NameInstructorInstitution
Anass FathaniSamir AguenaouAl Akhawayn University
Hakim Ibrahim BakriSamir AguenaouAl Akhawayn University
Idir MoukhlisSamir AguenaouAl Akhawayn University
Maria BaijouSamir AguenaouAl Akhawayn University
Oussama Er-radySamir AguenaouAl Akhawayn University
Safaa SmidiSamir AguenaouAl Akhawayn University
Salma El HaddajiSamir AguenaouAl Akhawayn University
Xiaoyuxuan XuScott LivengoodArizona State University
Taylor RiceScott LivengoodArizona State University
Lachlan PollockKanchan BandyopadhyayAustralian Catholic University
Bohdana ClancyKanchan BandyopadhyayAustralian Catholic University
Brett DobbieKanchan BandyopadhyayAustralian Catholic University
Kurt MagnerKanchan BandyopadhyayAustralian Catholic University
Dan HeathDuke RogersBethany College 
Elijah MartinezDuke RogersBethany College 
Wyatt GuthrieDuke RogersBethany College 
Ben LagueGreg StollerBoston University
Jessica WahbaGreg StollerBoston University
William KingsleyGreg StollerBoston University
Nicolas VallejoOmar ValeroBroward College
David Son LamRhonda RhodesCal Poly Pomona
Brittany WeatherlyChristina JamesCentral Carolina Technical College
Valerie BrownDiane FulcherCentral Carolina Technical College
Ian DorsBob HasbrouckChristopher Newport University
Daniel HulettBob HasbrouckChristopher Newport University
William StockhausenBob HasbrouckChristopher Newport University
Dylan RiceBob HasbrouckChristopher Newport University
William DavisBob HasbrouckChristopher Newport University
Cheyenne AbbettLori TuckerConcordia University
Tommy NguyenLori TuckerConcordia University
Garrett MaakestadJen SchulteDes Moines Area Community College
Tian LinguoJosh DainesDes Moines Area Community College
Bao Chau VuMitch LindquistDes Moines Area Community College
Rachel ChinyamaMitch LindquistDes Moines Area Community College
Corry BurtonReggie SinhaDes Moines Area Community College
Nate WernerReggie SinhaDes Moines Area Community College
Kiry MomphoIan Wagner Drexel University
Nithish RajaIan Wagner Drexel University
Preston MahoneyIan Wagner Drexel University
Daniel OldakLeslie MansfieldDuquesne University
Alex AngleBob HirthHigh Point University
Jamie WestBob HirthHigh Point University
Mason BaileyPaul ForsheyHigh Point University
Kathy ChenHouse of Cornelia
Sam ChowdhuryHouse of Cornelia
Wagner LessaShelley MitchellHult International Business School
Tristan ReadAlison Shields, James Morton, John Vongas, Sean Reid, Warren SchlesingerIthaca College
Austin RuffinoAlison Shields, James Morton, John Vongas, Sean Reid, Warren SchlesingerIthaca College
Charlie EberleAlison Shields, James Morton, John Vongas, Sean Reid, Warren SchlesingerIthaca College
Colin NortonAlison Shields, James Morton, John Vongas, Sean Reid, Warren SchlesingerIthaca College
Elaina WeirAlison Shields, James Morton, John Vongas, Sean Reid, Warren SchlesingerIthaca College
Brandon BrownBrian CareyJohnson & Wales University
Divine OnyemeBrian CareyJohnson & Wales University
Sarah GrumboMindy BeanLinn Benton Community College
Christy RuseMindy BeanLinn Benton Community College
Ian AndrewsMindy BeanLinn Benton Community College
Cassandra BaitleyBruce WrightLoyalist College
Danielle FoshayBruce WrightLoyalist College
Christal Palmer Bruce WrightLoyalist College
Nathan HellerDan BielinskiMadison College
Derrick SchmidtDan BielinskiMadison College
Moeen WaniTui Taulapapa Manukau Institute of Technology
Jin FongTui Taulapapa Manukau Institute of Technology
Luther GrayTui Taulapapa Manukau Institute of Technology
Katherine HerreraShanthi GopalakrishnanNew Jersey Institute of Technology
Stephanie TurciosShanthi GopalakrishnanNew Jersey Institute of Technology
Vaidehi DaveShanthi GopalakrishnanNew Jersey Institute of Technology
Jessica RichardsonDavid KitlanPennsylvania State University
Montana GleasonDavid KitlanPennsylvania State University
Paul WarmanDavid KitlanPennsylvania State University
Stephen HengeliDavid KitlanPennsylvania State University
Kaitlyn StolDustin QuirkRed Deer College
George Van CampenDustin QuirkRed Deer College
Maria Luisa FroilanEbenezer SackeyRed Deer College
Chris FerrariJohn WardRochester Institute of Technology
Dell DanusaputroJohn WardRochester Institute of Technology
Michael DeRobertisJohn WardRochester Institute of Technology
Philip RottkampJohn WardRochester Institute of Technology
Melody LinMike HolubarSanta Clara University
Johnathan BorstShawn LangeSanta Clara University
Jason FongTanya BungerSanta Clara University
Amelia Catherine LeeTanya BungerSanta Clara University
Brian Minh NguyenTanya BungerSanta Clara University
Darius Ramon JohnsonTanya BungerSanta Clara University
David IadanzaTanya BungerSanta Clara University
Jack William HickeyTanya BungerSanta Clara University
Aaron HiraharaBob FinocchioSanta Clara University
Augustine JunTim HarrisSanta Clara University
Dylan AllenTim HarrisSanta Clara University
Alex MordiniMike HolubarSanta Clara University
Ryan TurnerAbha SinghviSanta Clara University
John WalshAbha SinghviSanta Clara University
Sukhpreet SinghGreg Dodd, Mike KonkinSelkirk College
Pawanpreet SinghGreg Dodd, Mike KonkinSelkirk College
Naman VaidGreg Dodd, Mike KonkinSelkirk College
Huu Huy LamGreg Dodd, Mike KonkinSelkirk College
Jatin DhimanGreg Dodd, Mike KonkinSelkirk College
Manmeet Kaur AhujaGreg Dodd, Mike KonkinSelkirk College
Mohit ShahGreg Dodd, Mike KonkinSelkirk College
Nyari SharmaGreg Dodd, Mike KonkinSelkirk College
Manoj Kumar BhambriGreg Dodd, Mike KonkinSelkirk College
Avinash SinghGreg Dodd, Mike KonkinSelkirk College
Dung NguyenGreg Dodd, Mike KonkinSelkirk College
Sanchit JoshiGreg Dodd, Mike KonkinSelkirk College
Parker WakarukGreg Dodd, Mike KonkinSelkirk College
Andrew KoesterSenthil MuthusamySlippery Rock University
Mason DeHartSenthil MuthusamySlippery Rock University
Tace ZonaSenthil MuthusamySlippery Rock University
Duncan McMeikanJohn ArcherSouthern Institute of Technology
L.R.G.Nelum Wijekoon ArulalanJohn ArcherSouthern Institute of Technology
Marcelo Rodrigues Magioli SerenoJohn ArcherSouthern Institute of Technology
Ninushi Chathurika Suranji RathnayakaJohn ArcherSouthern Institute of Technology
Vijay SharmaJohn ArcherSouthern Institute of Technology
Daniel SammarcoMike SaleStonehill College
Danny ArriolaMike SaleStonehill College
Freddy ArriolaMike SaleStonehill College
Jack CookMike SaleStonehill College
Jada FroioMike SaleStonehill College
Anthony FrancisMike SaleStonehill College
Omoregie EnobakhareMike SaleStonehill College
Scott FraserMike SaleStonehill College
Tyler RachauskasMike SaleStonehill College
Ben SimmonsMike SaleStonehill College
Jeffrey BrothersRalph ArmentaSUNY Empire State College
Jesse oleetRalph ArmentaSUNY Empire State College
Miklos szaboRalph ArmentaSUNY Empire State College
Mohandass RamuGlenn Cumberland, Robert RychlikTAFE NSW
Mat MillardJocelyn AwwadTAFE SA – AIT
Dat NguyenJames AriailTarrant County College District
Helena LiuDarl Kolb, Audrea WarnerUniversity of Auckland
Mila LeeDarl Kolb, Audrea WarnerUniversity of Auckland
Ben EuhusDoug AlbertsonUniversity of Idaho
Brian FrankDoug AlbertsonUniversity of Idaho
Zuelah YagerDoug AlbertsonUniversity of Idaho
Adam MehrKevin CooperUniversity of North Dakota
Cole BeeversKevin CooperUniversity of North Dakota
Nate BassingerDave DusseauUniversity of Oregon
Jason ChenDave DusseauUniversity of Oregon
Cooper HinmanDoug WilsonUniversity of Oregon
Chris GastonDoug WilsonUniversity of Oregon
Maya LortonDoug WilsonUniversity of Oregon
Marcus LydonErik FordUniversity of Oregon
Jordan RichardsErik FordUniversity of Oregon
 Jessica van DeinseErik FordUniversity of Oregon
Ryan ChuTom DurantUniversity of Oregon
Bretten FarrellTom Durrant University of Oregon
Jadon ConverseTom Durrant University of Oregon
Riley FarrellTom Durrant University of Oregon
Shawn ReccaTom DurantUniversity of Oregon
Asha Miller-SowersDavid DusseauUniversity of Oregon
Issa El BraidiDrew EvansUniversity of Winnipeg
Nikita TsyganovGary BrownstoneUniversity of Winnipeg
Joshua ManiaccoMaryam Memar ZadehUniversity of Winnipeg
Kyle McCoyMaryam Memar ZadehUniversity of Winnipeg
Quynh Anh NguyenMaryam Memar ZadehUniversity of Winnipeg
William ThomasVirginia Commonwealth University
Apeksha Nidarshani PeirisNancy NankivellWaikato Institute of Technology
Dhruv VermaNancy NankivellWaikato Institute of Technology
Suryaprakash VasudevanNancy NankivellWaikato Institute of Technology
Deborah FreshwaterAndrew ColosimoWestmoreland Community College
Jessica MehalickAndrew ColosimoWestmoreland Community College
Robert StonerBob HasbrouckWestmoreland Community College
Mary PetersonShannon GazzeWestmoreland Community College
William ClarkShannon GazzeWestmoreland Community College
best practice teaching online with simulations

Smartsims Business Simulations in Select Journal Articles & Conferences

The following are a selection academic papers featuring our MikesBikes Introduction to Business Simulation and MikesBikes Advanced Strategic Management Simulation.

Using Assessment To Measure The Effectiveness of a Financial Simulation

Abstract: This study examines how useful a financial simulation is at reinforcing financial learning goals as measured by an assessment. Programs within many College of Businesses are under increasing pressure to demonstrate that students are learning within their courses, assessment is one method of documenting learning. Most accreditation certifications require colleges to provide an assurance of learning using assessment techniques at the course and program levels. Business simulations play a potentially significant role in reinforcing course learning goals which are measured by assessments and document the assurance of learning process. Results indicate an improved comprehension of financial learning objectives for students after completing a business simulation with financial content.

Nugent, N., Stoyanov, S. (2019), Using assessment to measure the effectiveness of a financial simulation. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 46 (2019), 187-198.

Business Simulation Performance After Completing a Reflective Observations Module

Abstract: Many factors can contribute to a student’s successful learning experience when participating in a business simulation as part of their undergraduate curriculum. It’s important for faculty to understand the best methods to deploy simulation assignments to students. Is there a benefit to having students answer a set of reflective observation questions? Reflective observation questions ask students to think about their past actions, and to describe the effects their decisions have on their simulation performance. The main objective of this research: using comparative data from two classes to define the effectiveness of student performance within a business simulation after completing sets of reflective observation questions after each round of the simulation.

Nugent, M. (2018). Business simulation performance after completing a reflective observations module. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 45 (2018), 31-41.

Business Simulation Team Performance After Completing and Individual Practice Module

Abstract: Many factors can contribute to a student’s successful learning experience when participating in team based simulations. What is the best way to deploy simulation assignments to students? Is there a benefit to having students complete a significant amount of simulation practice rounds before competing against each other in a team environment? The main objective of this research: using comparative data from two classes to define the effectiveness of student team performance within a business simulation after an individual simulation practice assignment has been completed.

Nugent, M. (2014). Business simulation team performance after completing an individual practice module. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 41(2014), 157-164.

Instructing undergraduates in marketing strategy: from hindsight to foresight

Abstract: We are very good at instructing our students with explanations of the past. Unfortunately, prior research has noted that many business postgraduates misuse theory, as they tend to apply concepts they have been taught in the past, rather than adapt and apply foresight to a particular present context. Highly controversial work published earlier exposed the misuse of the popular Boston Consulting Group (BCG) matrix. Empirical evidence revealed that the BCG matrix leads to poor strategic marketing decisions causing managers to focus upon market share rather than profitability. In this present study, the earlier work is extended, using more controls and a larger suite of experimental conditions. A series of experiments were conducted, working with a sample of 221 executives in-training and experienced practitioners, in North America and New Zealand.

Spanier, N., (2013). Instructing undergraduates in marketing strategy: from hindsight to foresight. Marketing Education: New Challenges and Opportunities, 2013, 40-50.

The Development & Implementation of Business Simulations in Higher Education in the United Kingdom

Abstract: This thesis is a study of the development and implementation of business simulations/games in United Kingdom Higher Education institutions. The research takes an holistic approach and examines the topic from the perspective of developers of business simulations, academics who choose to implement simulations in their teaching, and students who are the end users of business simulations.

Doonga, N. (2013). The development and implementation of business simulations in higher education in the United Kingdom. OpenAIR@RGU.

Gender and Comparative Evaluations in Student Groups

Abstract: It is well documented that students generally overestimate their grades in coursework, and some studies have found that male students overestimate their test scores more than females do. This study examines gender differences when self-evaluations are compared to peer evaluations within student groups. Differences are found between male students and female students in their ability to accurately judge their own contributions in group work relative to the evaluations they receive from their peers.

Ammons, J. L., Brooks, C. M. (2013), Gender and comparative evaluations in student groups, Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 17(2) 39-46.

Practitioner Heuristics: Adapting Student to Co-op Placement

Abstract: When people make efficient decisions that ignore some information or cues, they use their natural, intuitive ability to employ heuristics. The effectiveness of heuristics depends on the appropriateness to a given context.

Spanier, N., Franklin, D. (2013), Practitioner heuristics: adapting student to co-op placement, New Zealand Association for Cooperative Education: Strategic Directions in Cooperative Education, 31-33.

Learning to Lead: Mind Games for Middle Managers

Abstract: Middle management in tertiary education is a role made challenging by the current popularity of distributed leadership, allied with the mutually incompatible demands of the job, described in the Integrated Competing Values Framework. Middle managers need knowledge and experience to manage those challenges but these are not skills which are acquired quickly. Scenario based learning, role playing and games have been identified as effective ways of developing that knowledge and experience and demonstrating desired behaviours by problem solving familiar or recurring issues, in an environment people recognise.

Morgan, S. (2012). Learning to lead: mind games for middle managers. Tertiary Education Management Conference: Refereed Papers, 2012, 129-135.

Capital Structure and Dividend Policy in an Intro to Business Course

Abstract: At the undergraduate level, capital structure and dividend policy are generally introduced in a basic finance class and further developed in advanced courses in corporate finance. Exposure to the concept of shareholder wealth maximization earlier in the curriculum would be beneficial for student understanding of business decision-making. It is difficult to grasp the complexities of the process without some basic appreciation of the financing aspect of those business decisions. This paper outlines a pedagogical method for incorporating capital structure and dividend policy decisions into an Introduction to Business course through the use of a business simulation.

Reid, S., LaBonia, L., Shaw-Ching Liu, B., Luoma, P., and Asare, A. (2009). Capital structure and dividend policy in an intro to business course. Journal of Instructional Techniques in Finance, Spring (2009).

Learning Assurance Using Business Simulations: Applications to Executive Management Education

Abstract: Today the number of working managers returning to the classroom is growing rapidly as a result of globalization and technological developments. Many students are enrolling in executive management degree programs (EMBA) which feature flexibility and a focus on results. While most EMBA programs are delivered in a different format than the traditional MBA program the requirement for learning assurance is still essential. Simulations, which are used extensively throughout most EMBA programs as part of the experiential learning process, provide one approach for evaluating the effectiveness of curriculum design and delivery. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate how simulation in concert the development of rubrics can be used to support the learning assurance process in EMBA type programs.

Hall, Owen P. Jr. & Ko, Kenneth. (2006). Learning assurance using business simulations: applications to executive management education. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 33(2006).

Mike’s Bikes: Net Mike Version

Smith, P., Carrie, D. (2004). Mike’s Bikes: Net Mike Version. Simulation & Gaming (SAGE) 35(4), 527-529.

Mike’s Bikes: Solo Mike Version

Smith, P., Carrie, D. (2004). Mike’s Bikes: Solo Mike Version. Simulation & Gaming (SAGE) 35(4), 525-535.

MikesBikes-Business-Simulation-featured-in-Rethinking-Undergraduate-Education

MIKESBIKES BUSINESS SIMULATION IN “RETHINKING UNDERGRADUATE BUSINESS EDUCATION”

The [MikesBikes] business simulation does a superb job of teaching students to link concepts with experience and motivating them toward their future studies in business.

COLBY, A., EHRLICH, T., SULLIVAN, W. & DOLLE, J. (2011) RETHINKING UNDERGRADUATE BUSINESS EDUCATION: LIBERAL LEARNING FOR THE PROFESSION

Rethinking Undergraduate Business Education: Liberal Learning for the Profession Textbook

What the book covers: Business is the largest undergraduate major in the United States and still growing. This reality, along with the immense power of the business sector and its significance for national and global well-being, makes quality education critical not only for the students themselves but also for the public good.

The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching’s national study of undergraduate business education found that most undergraduate programs are too narrow, failing to challenge students to question assumptions, think creatively, or understand the place of business in larger institutional contexts. Rethinking Undergraduate Business Education examines these limitations and describes the efforts of a diverse set of institutions to address them by integrating the best elements of liberal arts learning with business curriculum to help students develop wise, ethically grounded professional judgment. (Google Books)

MikesBikes at Santa Clara University

The textbook covered MikesBikes in Chapter 3 on “The Challenges of Undergraduate Business Education.” They interviewed a Santa Clara University instructor on how MikesBikes is currently used in the Contemporary American Business Course – a course that is required for all entering business majors at the Leavy School of Business.

MikesBikes in Contemporary American Business Course

[MikesBikes] provides a “liberal arts” experience in that it gives the “broad exposure” that is the aim of a survey course. And certainly we were impressed with students’ level of engagement, intellectual energy, and seriousness – qualities one wants to see in all aspects of a college education.

INSTRUCTOR FROM SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY

Santa Clara University has been using MikesBikes for many years now. The course is designed to provide an overview of business as a field.

The course includes standard classroom presentations, multiple choice examinations and one-third of the students final grade is dependent on their performance in the MikesBikes simulation. They run the simulation for the whole semester.

The first half of the semester allows the students to get familiar with the simulation and concepts through the Single-Player, practice phase. In the second half, they work in teams and compete against other teams in the course to achieve the highest Shareholder Value.

In MikesBikes, students are given an opportunity to work in marketing, production, product development, finance and accounting. Each member of the team are responsible in making decisions in these functions, allowing them to develop and make complex strategic decisions.

The course through the use of the MikesBikes business simulation provides students with an experiential learning environment, allowing them to take on realistic roles in a manufacturing bike company. They learn how to think critically and coordinate a management strategy. They experience the highs and lows of running a business, the excitement and risks all in a fun, and safe learning environment. In addition, working in teams allow them to learn about the importance of trustworthiness and integrity.

Reference: Colby, A., Ehrlich, T., Sullivan, W. & Dolle, J. (2011) Rethinking Undergraduate Business Education: Liberal Learning for the Profession, Stanford, CA: Wiley.

Ready to take your course to the next level?

Increase student engagement and motivation with Smartsims Business Simulations. Contact us to learn more.

company selling subsidiary

Takeovers: Selling Your Subsidiary | MikesBikes Advanced Business Simulation

You can sell your shareholding in a company at any time.

The sale price is based on the Share Price of the subsidiary at the end of the period in which you choose to sell.

The financial decisions you make for your subsidiary during the sale period will be ignored.

Any loans outstanding when you sell your subsidiary will be written off as a bad debt (debt to bank is unaffected)

If you are unable or unwilling to continue to lend to a struggling subsidiary then you should cut your losses and sell your shareholding.

Interested in learning more about Takeovers? Check this article out: Takeovers in MikesBikes Advanced

Standard Segment in Music2Go featured image

Market Segments in Music2Go Marketing Simulation: Standard Segment

This article will be a three-part series introducing the market segments in Music2Go Marketing Business Simulation. In this article, we’ll be talking about the Standard Segment.

Market Segments in Music2Go Marketing

There are three market segments in Music2Go – Standard, Youth, and Sports (Multi-Player only).

These segments have different sizes, projected growth, sensitivity to price, advertising, distribution, and product specs.

You start with a single MP3 Player product in the Standard market segment. Starting in Year 3 (after 2nd rollover) you may improve your existing product and/or launch additional products into new market segments (up to a maximum of 4 products by Year 6). Part of the challenge of Music2Go is in being able to balance the needs of your products within your limited marketing budget.

Standard Segment

Consumers in this segment tend to be less active than those in the Sports segment and thus do not require the high level of technological specifications inherent in sports designs. While young adults in this segment share the purchasing ability of their sports counterparts, they are more price conscious, which is reflected in the relative pricing between these two segments.

  • Medium priced ($85 – $100) with high price sensitivity
  • Price range is $40 to $120, but the recommended range is $85 to $100.
  • Medium sensitivity to advertising
  • High sensitivity to distribution coverage
  • Low sensitivity to product specifications
  • Consumer style / tech spec preferences change slowly, so segment moves
    slowly on perceptual map.

Since consumers in this segment are highly price sensitive, you can expect some price competition. Plan for this with cost reduction projects to maintain acceptable unit margins. However, be careful of engaging in a price war. No one wins a war. This is the slowest moving segment and has low sensitivity to product specs. So you may only require a single product spec improvement project midway through the simulation to remain competitive. It is the largest of the three segments but has minimal underlying growth.

You will be selling a single Standard Segment music player in the first two years of the simulation. After the 2nd rollover you may launch additional products into the Youth and Sports segments (Multi-Player only).

Related Articles: 
group of people with thumbs up - business simulations are where mistakes are encouraged

Business Simulations: where making mistakes are encouraged

Making mistakes simply means you are learning faster.

Weston Agor

Who likes making mistakes? Majority of us probably don’t like making one or try our best to avoid it.

In school, we always thrive to do the best we can to avoid making mistakes in our exams or essays to avoid failing.

At work, would you hire someone who says they often make mistakes or promote someone who constantly does? Majority of employers probably wouldn’t.

Here at Smartsims Business Simulations, we believe that we often learn best and the most when we fail, and make mistakes. This allows us to look back, analyze what and where we have gone wrong and restart. If there’s an opportunity, we can also get feedback from our mistakes. This gives us a brand new start to take action and hopefully never make the same mistake again.

However, realistically, we seldom get a second shot to do all these, right? Professors in universities will rarely allow you to redo an exam you already failed. You won’t get another shot of winning that soccer match you already lost. You would lost an opportunity to get promoted if you missed your quota.

Good news is with Smartsims Business Simulations, failure and mistakes are encouraged!

The foundation of simulation-based learning is that we learn by doing. Our objective is to give students an opportunity to have their own business experience, and mirror what it’s like in the real world. This allows them to take responsibility over their own learning and become personally engaged with the content. They get to manage their own company in a fun and safe environment, while allowing them to learn through trial and error, testing different decisions and strategies.

Every business simulation includes a practice and competitive application. Once students are familiar with the simulation format, their teams develop strategy and make key decisions for their organization. Students use real-time market and business reports to effectively analyze market conditions; develop strategy; and, evaluate the impact of their choices.

All our business simulations provide students with a platform to develop an understanding of business concepts, make strategic and critical decisions, and allow them to see the immediate impact of their decisions.

Here, failure is encouraged and allowed, so that they can try better approaches and methods.

Provide your students with a unique learning opportunity and take your course to the next level with Smartsims. Contact us to learn more.

Correcting a failed product development project

Question of the Week: How do I correct a failed Product Development Project? | MikesBikes Advanced Business Simulation

You want to get product development projects right the first time as this can be a costly mistake. It can mean either your Unit Prime Cost is higher than you want and/or your specifications are not as you wanted resulting in a lower demand for your product if they are wrong.

There could be two reasons why your project failed:

1. The project/budget expenditure was too low and/or
2. The requested unit prime cost was unrealistically low

As in real life, you do not want to commit to a product development project without checking that it was appropriately funded and that it would be able to provide an acceptable return on investment.

In addition, you have to be careful that the specifications you enter for your new product actually fall close to the ideal point of the segment you are targeting. Look under Key Reports for Perceptual Map of Market Segments to check this. Products outside the radius of influence (i.e. outside the circles) will not sell at all.

How do we conduct successful development projects?

We will walk you through an example where we develop the design for a racers bike. While the specifics and calculations may change, the steps you follow will be the same:

1. View the Indicative Values for Market Segments within the Product Development Scenario Information report to view the ideal product attribute levels desired by each segment.

(Note: These desired product attributes by each market segment change slightly from year to year so be sure to keep monitoring for the changes.)

Indicative Values for Market Segments

2. Take the current Style/Tech Specs of your closest existing Design Project and calculate the required change in Style/Design and Technical Specs.

In our example, the closest existing Design Project is our Adventurer Bike. You can view the Product Development Project Results Report to view your closest existing design paying attention to the Style/Design and Technical Specs:

Product Development Project Results Report

3. Calculate the difference in Style and Technical Specifications between the desired design and the closest existing design.

As you can see, in this example, our only and closest existing design project is our Adventurer product. This features specifications of 50 Style and 60 Technical. Our desired design project has targeted specifications of 20 Style and 86 Technical.

So the difference is 30 Style and 26 Technical.

Estimated Costs and Time Frames

We can see on the Product Development Scenario Information report that each unit of Style development costs $1000 and each unit of Technical development costs $20,000.

Our example calculation will be:

30 x $1,000 added to 26 x $20,000 = $550,000

Therefore, our design cost would be $550,000 on the new design to achieve 20 Style and 86 echnical.

4. Calculate your prime cost.

From the table above we can see that the prime cost will be calculated at roughly $0.1 to $0.15 per design and $4.50 to $5.00 per technical specification. We want a racers bike with 20 style/design and 86 technical specifications.

A conservative calculation would therefore be:

0.15 x 20 added to 5.00 x 86 = $433

If we enter any additional expenditure on to our design cost this will be used to further reduce the Prime Cost.

Note: This does NOT mean you should always aim super low with target Prime Cost.  If you aim too low, then your project won’t have enough money to achieve its objectives and you will miss your style / tech spec targets as well as your prime cost target.

How do I correct a failed product design?

A failed product design is a design that shows anything less than 100% success rate within the Product Development Results Report. Unfortunately this means you will need to design the design again. However! The failed design is likely to be a lot closer to your desired specifications than the previous closest design, thus it means it is likely to be cheaper to invest in. Simply follow the process above again working off the new closest existing design (even if the closest existing design is a failure).

Check out our Common Mistakes in MikesBikes Advanced article.